Colin
H. Smith: "Creepy Cuteness" Saint John Times Globe. September
23, 1999
CREEPY
CUTENESS:
Mitch Robertson's exhibit offers a commentary on our obsession with
fame and wealth
According to Mitch Robertson's
guest book, his Famous™ portraits show at Judith Mackin's
"The Space" gallery on Canterbury Street has not been
a well-visited art event.
Too bad. Robertson's
offering is a humorously political commentary on today's society
that asks, among other things, the question, "Does 15 minutes
of fame include commercial breaks?" It challenges the viewer
to explore the uneasy relationship between art and the fame, beauty,
wealth, and marketing which drive its commerce.
Robertson, an energetic
Toronto-based twenty-something whose work has recently been exhibited
in galleries in Moncton, Ottawa and Northern Ireland, clearly loves
to play with the contradictions and tensions that result from the
clash between high art and popular culture, and the market-driven
and the creative. He challenges our objective and subjective responses
by presenting a satirical and paradoxical commentary that deconstructs
certain aspects of our consumer-driven society while not condemning
it.
In a recent interview
published in SEE Magazine, Robertson said his aim was to get the
viewer to explore these dichotomies in an attempt to explain why
our society desires such constructions. His main interest is "to
explore our obsession with fame, wealth and collectibles."
On entering the airy
gallery, the viewer is greeted by a series of 10 large (36"
x 48") canvasses featuring laser-printed images of dolls -
blown-up reproductions of actual collector doll advertisements -
on gilded backgrounds, discreetly framed, and hung with the reverence
usually accorded to fine art. The tacky, sentimental, oversized
porcelain heads, with huge lambent eyes and saccharine slogans,
are the kind of dolls offered to "serious" collectors
by companies such as the Franklin Mint and similar collectible marketing
companies.
Robertson places at the
bottom corner of each canvas an enlarged order form - complete with
the necessary phone numbers - so that the viewer can purchase one
of the precious and somewhat creepy dolls that he has parodied.
One of the questions
that Robertson's work raises is why "collector" dolls
are commodities treated as objects of value in our society. Well,
for one thing, dolls - unlike real children - never grow up. They
demand nothing of us. Could this explain their popularity?
Robertson implies that
Western manufacturing relates to the hyping of brand names rather
than marketing quality goods, and is not flattering the companies
that produce mail-order collectible dolls, he maintains that his
intention is not to try to change people's view of these products.
Rather, he makes a satirical statement about both the dark side
of toy ancestry (the Brothers Grimm, for instance) and the sentimental
impulses that drive our consumer-oriented society.
As Robertson points out,
"Buy Sell Trade. Obsessions with fame, beauty, wealth, and
collectibles. We are all part of it. I just want to make you aware."
As for fame and its price,
five 'portraits' of Diana hang in another part of the gallery. These
smaller 8"x lO" works - in this case not enlarged - are
magazine images of the late Princess of Wales, and are, significantly
perhaps, surrounded by artificial gold leaf.
In the doll images, early
childhood is depicted through exaggeratedly "adorable"
features such as chubby cheeks, dimples and large eyes. Here, Diana
is portrayed in a cloying, impossibly sweet beauty that is at odds
with the gruesome end of her life, further suggesting that physical
beauty is transitory while the cost of fame and wealth can be a
high one.
All of the pieces in
Robertson's show lead to provocative questions:
Does art have the power
to reveal what was previously unseen? Can the artist make what was
always seen be seen in a new way?
Clearly, Robertson has
taken the image of the mass-produced - the magazine advertisement,
the "collectible" doll manufactured in countless thousands
- and combined them to make original art. While the artist is the
first to agree that his work questions the value of fame ("it's
what my work is all about," he recently said), the contradiction
is that recent acquisitions of his work by the Art Gallery of Ontario's
E. P. Taylor Research Library and the National Gallery's Art Metropole
Archive will ensure it for him personally.
- Colin H. Smith